|
Reviewer's Comment:
This table is a list of articles, essays, books and definitions about the
concept of maneuver and the developing discussions about the nature of maneuver
in comparison and contract with other concepts.
|
|
|
Attrition:
Attrition warfare is a military strategy consisting of belligerent attempts to
win a war by wearing down the enemy to the point of collapse through continuous
losses in personnel and materiel. The word attrition comes from the Latin root
atterere to rub against, similar to the "grinding down" of the
opponent's forces in attrition warfare. The German term actually is better
translated as 'exhaustion'.
|
|
|
The contrasting strategy to 'attrition' is 'annihilation'
both are means employed to achive political ends. Neither actually requires
achievement of complete military attrition or annihilation. The goal, end,
sought is the result that the opponent's WILL to continue has resulted in his
surrender or willingness to negociate.
|
|
|
Annihilation:
A war of annihilation (German: Vernichtungskrieg) or war of extermination
(destruction) is a type of war in which the goal is the complete annihilation
of a state, a people or an ethnic minority through genocide or through the
destruction of their livelihood. The goal can be outward-directed or inward,
against elements of one's own population. The goal is not like other types of
warfare, the recognition of limited political goals, such as recognition of a
legal status (such as in a war of independence), control of disputed territory
(as in war of aggression or defensive war), or the total military defeat of an
enemy state.
|
|
|
Annihilation is a military strategy in which an attacking
army seeks to entirely destroy the military capacity of the opposing army. This
strategy can be executed in a single planned pivotal battle, called a
"battle of annihilation". A successful battle of annihilation is
accomplished through the use of tactical surprise, application of overwhelming
force at a key point, or other tactics performed immediately before or during
the battle. The end goal of a battle of annihilation is to cause the leaders of
the opposing army to sue for peace due to the complete annihilation of its army
and thus inability to further engage in offensive or defensive military action.
It is not necessary to kill or capture all, or even most, of an opposing army's
forces to annihilate it in the sense used here. Rather, the destruction of the
enemy army as a cohesive military force able to offer further meaningful
military offense or defense, even if temporarily, is the objective.
|
|
|
Firepower:
Firepower is the military capability to direct force at an enemy. (It is not to
be confused with the concept of rate of fire, which describes the cycling of
the firing mechanism in a weapon system.) Firepower involves the whole range of
potential weapons. The concept is generally taught as one of the three key
principles of modern warfare wherein the enemy forces are destroyed or have
their will to fight negated by sufficient and preferably overwhelming use of
force as a result of combat operations. Through the ages firepower has come to
mean offensive power applied from a distance, thus involving ranged weapons as
opposed to one-on-one close quarters combat. Firepower is thus something
employed to keep enemy forces at a range where they can be defeated in detail
or sapped of the will to continue. In the field of naval artillery, the weight
of a broadside was long used as a figure of merit of a warship's firepower.
|
|
|
Shock tactics:
This is accomplished by direct contact, bayonet or sword fighting, or direct
contact by cavalry lances or swords as opposed to slings or bows and arrows.
|
|
|
Position warfare:
This strategy is generally employed when the defense is stronger that offense
and employs fortifications. It an also result from features of terrain and
logistic capabilities. It can be the result of the political ends sought being
acquisition of a limited territory or surrender of the opponent when his
capital is threatened. Position warfare was the typical strategy of 18th
century warfare of which Frederick the Great was a master. It was replaced by
the maneuver warfare adopted by Napoleon.
|
|
|
Ralph Peters, In Praise of Attrition
|
|
|
Richard Maltz, Comment on Peters' essay on Attrition
|
|
|
J. Boone Bartholomees Jr., The Issue of Attrition
|
|
|
J. Boone Bartholomees Jr., The Issue of Attrition
|
|
|
Crawley, Major Skip, review of -Maneuver Warfare: An
Anthology. Edited by Richard D. Hooker. New York, NY: Press, 1933. ISBN:
978-0891415183,409 pp.
|
|
|
Decision Theory:
Decision theory (or the theory of choice not to be confused with choice theory)
is the study of an agent's choices.
Decision theory can be broken into two branches: normative decision theory,
which analyzes the outcomes of decisions or determines the optimal decisions
given constraints and assumptions, and descriptive decision theory, which
analyzes how agents actually make the decisions they do. Decision theory is
closely related to the field of game theory and is an interdisciplinary topic,
studied by economists, statisticians, data scientists, psychologists,
biologists, political and other social scientists, philosophers and computer
scientists. Empirical applications of this rich theory are usually done with
the help of statistical and econometric methods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hughes, MG. B. P.,Firepower: Weapons Effectiveness
on the Battlefield, 1630 -1850, Sarpedon, N.Y., 1997, index. bibliography,
tbles, illustrations
|
|
|
Jomini, Baron de, Art of War, Capt. G. H. Mendell,
and Lieut., W. P Craighall, trans. and eds., Wilder Pubs. Radford VA. 2008, 296
pgs., paperback. -There are other editions.
|
|
|
Antoine Henri Jomini Baron, biography in Encyclopedia Com.
|
|
|
Antoine Henri Jomini Baron, biography in Wikipedia.com.
|
|
|
Antoine Henri Jomini - The Art of War, Condensed
Version ed. Brig Gen J. D. Hittle,
|
|
|
Karl von Clausewitz, On War,
|
|
|
Hanz Delbruck, History of the Art of War, and many
other books and essays. The 'delbrucklist' includes many commentators on
Delbruck's work.
|
|
|
Count Alfred Von Schlieffen, Cannae
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capt L. A. Robinson, Intelligence & Maneuver
Warfare
|
|
|
|
|
|
World Atlas, What is Maneuver?
|
|
|
Fourth Generation Warfare
|
|
|
Marinus, Zweikampf Dynamic - Maneuverist No 2
|
|
|
Marinus, Maneuverist NO 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Matthew J. Schultz, The Operational Warfare Revolution:
How Operational Art Can Prepare the Marine Corps for an Era of Great Power
Competition
|
|
|
Major Sean Barrett, Mike Augier & Col, Michael D.
Wyly, Remaneuverizing the Marine Corps
|
|
|
Two Maneuverists, What the Marines Believe
About War and Warfare
|
|
|
Major J. D. Burke, Maneuver Warfare and MAGTF
|
|
|
Capt. Daniel R. Graizier & William S. Lind Maneuver
warfare 2015
|
|
|
William Lind, Defining Maneuver Warfare
|
|
|
William Lind Biography
|
|
|
Arthur Bloom, William Lind's Way of War
|
|
|
Jim Lacy, The Continuing Irrelevance of William Lind
|
|
|
Arthur Bloom, William Lind's Way Of War
|
|
|
John Boyd, Wikipedia bio
|
|
|
https://mca-marines.org/blog/gazette/re-maneuverizing-the-marine-corps/ |
|