|
GENERALISSIMUS
ALEXANDER SUVOROV
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portraits of Suvorov
|
|
|
Philip Longworth - biography of Suvorov -
Constable, London, 1965, 350 pgs, index, references, maps, illustrations. This
is the best biography of Suvorov in English. The author made extensive use of
Russian sources. In particular Longworth references - G. P. Meshcheryakov (ed)
Suvorov; Documenty (Moscow, 1949-53) and N. Korbkov, Generalissimus
Suvorov: Sbornik Documentov (Moscow, 1947). Longworth discusses, quotes
from, and evaluates Nauka. He notes that Suvorov's recommendations including
those in the book were not well received by contemporary Russia.
|
|
|
Reviewer Comment:
As Dr. Longworth notes, Suvorov was the only military leader in Russian history
to be titled a Generalissimo, until Stalin gave himself that title. But Stalin
knew his history and brought forth the name of Suvorov during World War II to
inspire the nation, and in particular the military at time of despair. Stalin
had also used the name and exploits of Alexander Nevski. The maps are excellent
to show the reader the locations of very unfamiliar names of places and
campaign routes. Readers familiar with the basic summaries found in western
general military history books of Suvorov's campaigns and more famous victories
such as at Ismail and through Switzerland may find Dr. Longworth's extensive
descriptions of the actual treatment Suvorov endured from the contemporary
Russian military establishment (not only his superiors, but also even his
subordinates) not only surprising but also dismaying.
|
|
|
Preface:
Dr. Longworth explains his use of original sources as much as possible. He
writes that he has focused more on Suvorov's campaigns in Eastern Europe
because French and Austrian authors have provided sufficient publications.
|
|
|
Introduction:
De. Longworth discusses the way in which the name of Suvorov was used during
World War II as an emblem to generate public encouragement. He summarizes the
book's content, while doing so. "He (Suvorov) was a soldier of immense
experience - he fought the Poles, the Turks, recalcitrant tribesmen and the
armies of Revolutionary France." ...." He won far too frequently to
be called lucky: he never lost." And this point is critical considering
the nature of armies and their soldiers in the 18th century: "Above all he
possessed an extraordinary genius for inspiring the absolute devotion of his
soldiers: he could demand any sacrifice of them and they would make it
willingly."
|
|
|
1. The Making of a Soldier - November 1729 - October 1768:
Dr. Longworth begins with his description of Suvorov's birth and and his
family: grandfather, Ivan, a military scribe for Peter; father, Vassily, a
captain but future general. His mother, Avdotya Fedoseyevna Manukova, was the
daughter of another senior official, later Governor of St. Petersburg.
Alexander's father, Vassily, had retired into the senior civil service and
wanted his son to join that. But young (13 years old) Alexander insisted on a
military career. Vassily asked his friend, the very famous general Hannibal, to
counsel Alexander, but after having conversed with him, Hannibal told the
father that Alexander would 'go far' in the military. Thus, on 22 October 1741
Alexander was enrolled into the Lifeguard Semenovski Regiment, a very
prestigious unit. He remained at home being taught by his father until age 15.
He already had a remarkable education from study of the famous leaders from
Caesar on. And he learned German, French and basic Italian. In addition he
studied tactics, military engineering, artillery, mathematics . He read
Plutarch and Cornelius Nepos. All this was far different and in advance of the
typical experience of other sons of the nobility who were automatically posted
into the imperial guard regiments, that in practice served mostly to put on
impressive parades.
Dr. Longworth summarized the typical life: "There were many young men who
passed through the regiments without ever obtaining a clear understanding even
of the words of command. As in the army as a whole, the accent on the parade
ground was so stressed that field exercises were almost forgotten." Dr.
Longworth continues by describing Suvorov's developing career in the broader
context of a description of the Russian army of the 18th century. He was
different from the usual officer in every respect. The typical officer was
corrupt, self aggrandizing, rapacious, venal, indifferent to his military
duties and to the life of the men. Suvorov was posted to several different
regiments, service that taught him the real practicalities of logistics,
organizational structures, and survival in the field. He also came to
understand the enlisted peasant soldier. In addition, Suvorov continued his
intellectual pursuits.
"Side by side with his practical acquaintance with the organization and
running of the army there went on in Suvorov an intellectual quest to construct
a philosophy of life." Dr. Longworth continues with a summary of Suvorov's
rise in rank and assignments to more responsibility during the 7 Years' War. He
gained experience in both military bureaucratic paperwork and command without
witnessing gunfire into 1759. In July 1761 he was assigned to General Berg's
cavalry and finally saw action. He was noted by his superiors for courage as
well as skill. He was in his element leading Cossacks in daring head long
attacks on larger units of Prussian hussars.
Dr. Longworth writes: "He enjoyed it all immensely." And he credits
these remarkable successes to Suvorov's study of human psychology and use of
speed and self-confidence, not only of himself but of his men. As a result of
his exploits he was frequently named in dispatches that reached even to the
College of War. Vasilly Suvorov had risen in rank and authority by 1762 and was
stationed in St. Petersburg where he took part in the coup that overthrew Tsar
Peter III and brought Catherine II to the throne. Alexander was far from the
city, but the prominence of his father helped to make his name known at
headquarters and court.
Suvorov was assigned to several other administrative positions and units, but
he found his real opportunity when he was promoted colonel and as commander of
the Suzdal Regiment. Russian regiments were like Fiefs - the realm of their
commanders. This gave Suvorov his opportunity to adopt his own theories and
methods from supply, rations, barracks conditions, to discipline of the
individual soldier to unit drill and tactical exercises. In describing
Suvorov's activities Dr. Longworth gives the readers an excellent, detailed
summary of conditions in the 18th century Russian Army. By contrasting
Suvorov's methods to the standards we learn about both. Among other
differences, the typical regimental commanders diverted to their own pockets a
sizable quantity of the sums allocated by the War Department to support the
regiment. Suvorov did not.
|
|
|
2. Military Experiments, November 1768 - February 1773:
The new scene into which Suvorov was thrust was Poland after the death of King
Augustus III in 1763 and Empress Catherine II's maneuver to place Stanislaus
Poniatowski on the throne. She used the problems of the minority Orthodox
Christians in the strongly Catholic country - in part to divert attention from
the peasant rebellions in her own. Polish nobles organized rebellion. Then in
Ukraine Cossacks rebelled and Ottoman Turks opened war. In 1768 Colonel Suvorov
was ordered to bring his Suzdal Regiment west to strengthen the Russian forces
there. He was promoted brigadier and given a full brigade.
Dr. Longworth describes in detail a Russian regiment on the march. The
Suzdalers reached Smolensk in a month, a month ahead of expectations. He soon
went into action against disorganized Polish groups. Immediately, his hallmark
tactic of speed and audacity became evident. He also used: "Suvorov used
three weapons: organization, training and cunning." If one of his
subordinate units lost an engagement due to its commander's mistakes, Suvorov
analyzed them and published his appraisal to his command. However, "His
unorthodoxy did not enamor him of his superiors, nor, indeed, of some of his
inferiors." "He had come to despise the formalists, especially since
they seemed to get all the laurels." Dr. Longworth also describes the
various Polish groups. Suvorov was promoted major general. Meanwhile, he chafed
at not being in battle with the Turks.
Dr. Longworth concludes the chapter with Suvorov's final taking of the Cracow
fortress and the Austrian, Prussian and Russian dismemberment of Poland.
|
|
|
3. A Legend in the Making - March 1773 - June 1774
Suvorov was first posted to the northern border but Sweden was not considering
war. He begged to go to an active front. Finally, we was posted to Rumyantsev's
army on the Turkish front in Moldavia. Dr. Longworth, as always, provides a
clear description of the opponent - ie Turks. The war had continued for5 years,
but Rumyantsev was not about to 'risk' serious offensive actionss. Suvorov was
sent to his former regiment, the Astrakhan, plus a Cossack detachment -in the
division in Lt. Gen. Saltykov's sector between Bucharest and Turtukai on the
Danube.
The map showing Suvorov's campaigns in that region between 1774 and 1790
appears confusing because the front in 1774 was far south of it in the 1780's.
One has to refer to the overall history of the several Russo-Turkish wars to
find out. In 1774 the Russians had penetrated along a narrow axis from Khotin,
far accross the Danube to Shumla although the Turks retained the Black Sea
coast as far north as the Bug River at Ochakov. That campaign ended one war. In
the next war the Russian campaign was along the Black Sea coast. Immediately
upon his arrival, Suvorov conducted his own personal reconnaisance. He was
already thinking of an offensive to capture Turtukai without delay. But, he was
immediately attacked at night by Turkish Spahis. He was rescued by his
carabiniers. Despite the Turk's now knowing he was near, he immediately
launched his infantry in waves of small boats across the Danube. Always at the
front,Suvorov was wounded but continued to direct the assault. He drove off the
larger Turkish garrison, captured their cannon and material, took it back
across the river and destroyed much of the town. He credited 'speed' and
unrelenting attacking for his victory. As Suvovov watched, the Turks returned
to Turtukai in larger force. Nevertheless, Saltykov ordered Suvorov attack
again, to divert Turkish attention from Rumayntsev's operations at Silistria.
So he attacked during the night on 17 June. He was again successful. He was
then ordered down stream to Hirsov, a smal Russian fort on the Danube. There we
again won a stunning victory over a much larger Turkish force that attempted to
capture the fort. But Rumyantsev refused to exploit the victory. While
Rumyantsev dithered along the Danube, Suvorov was sent across the river and far
south to Shumla where he faced almost 60,000 Turks. Again, but disciplie and
elan the Russians routed the Turks. The Turks were forced to sign a peace with
the Treaty of Kutchuk Kainardji. Suvorov was ordered to report in Moscow.
Although detested by the vain Russian military establishment he was now a
legend to the troops.
|
|
|
4. The Inglorious Years - July 1774 - July 1787
Suborov's assignments and resulting movements during these years was very
complex. And so is Dr. Longworth's deailed description. During this period
Yemelin Pugachev was raising a widening revolt along the Volga from Astrakan to
Kazan. Sovorov was sent to capture him and restor order.
Dr. Longworth describes Pugachev. Suvorov rushed to the front trying to capture
Pugachev but the rebel's own followers bound him and took him to the garrison
commander at Yaitsk. All Suvorov could do was take the imprisoned rebel to
Count Panin. He remained for months to restore order and organize
administration. In 1775 his father died, so he was given leave to oreganize
family affairs.
Meanwhile, in 1773 at the urging of his father he was married to Varvarka
Prozorovski, daughter of Prince Ivan Prozorovski who, in turn, was related to
the distingished Golitsyn family. This eventually proved to be a disaster.
At that point Suvorov, despite his disdain for Potemkin and the rest, found it
necessary for his career to gain Potemkin's favor. In 1776 he returned to Field
Marshal Rumyantsev's Ukrainian front and posted under Lt. Gen Alexander
Prozorovski, who was responsible for affairs in the Crimea and the Kuban.
But his wife, Varvarka, had her own 'affair' with Suvorov's second cousin. and
then, another, with an officer. Much trouble ensued from that because his
denunciation of Varvarka generated hostility from the Prozorovski family and
its friends at court.
For much of the time Ssuvorov was sent south to be the field commander of and
in both Crimea and Kuban. This placed him under Prozorovski and eventually
Potemkin. Dr. Longworth provides an excellent description of the Crimea, Kuban,
Circassia, and the foothills of the Caucausus, including the multitude of
different tribal groups who often fought each other.
|
|
|
5. Flailing the Turks
|
|
|
6. Enemy of a Nation
|
|
|
7. The Rejected Prophet
|
|
|
8. Against the Revolution
|
|
|
9. The Greatest Test
|
|
|
10. Suvorov's Place in Military History
|
|
|
The Art of Victory
|
|