{short description of image}  
 

GRAEBER, ONCE MORE

George Selgin

{short description of image}

Ideas for a Alternative Monetary Future, 2016, 6 pgs.

 
 

Reviewer Comment: This is a rejoinder attacking Graeber's response to Selgin's earlier article, The Myth of the Myth of Barter, in The Alt-M. org publication.
Apparently this 'discussion' has been conducted via 'tweets'. These 'worthys' attack each other but do not provide specific historical factual examples to analyze with each other. Graeber relies (as he did in his book - Debt) on anthropology (his speciality) rather than documentary history. Selgin relies on theories expounded by Adam Smith, Menger, Jevons and similar economist theoreticians. But those well known economists did not and could not know anything about ancient Mesopotamia or Egypt because the documentary sources were not even found, let alone translated, for a century and more.

 
 

The result is that Graeber and Selgin are writing about different fundamental issues but arguing about tangential subjects. In neither comment did Selgin discuss the central Graeber theory - the role of debt in society - actually what is debt. Graeber's book is about the phylosophical and psychological meaning of 'debt' and how that meaning has resonated throughout history. Selgin chooses to ignore that topic and instead denounce Graeber's narrow discussion of the role or lack of role of barter exchange as a predecessor to the ' invention' of money. For Selgin that is significant as it, in turn, is the basis for libertarian theory on money and banking

 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
{short description of image}

 
{short description of image}

 
{short description of image}

 
{short description of image}

 
{short description of image}

 
{short description of image}

 

Return to Xenophon.