|
Battle of Crannon 322 BC
|
|
|
Rickard, J (5 June 2007),
Battle of Crannon, August 322 B.C.,
http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/battles_crannon.html
|
|
|
The battle of Crannon was the
decisive land battle of the Lamian War, an attempt
by a Greek coalition led by Athens to win freedom from Macedonia. The Athenians
had been able to raise a sizable army from amongst the many mercenaries left
unemployed by the end of Alexanders Persian wars. Under the command of a
general called Leosthenes the Greeks had advanced
to Thermopylae, and then to the town of Lamia, in the south of Thessaly. There
Leosthenes had been killed by a slingshot fired from the town walls. Meanwhile,
the Athenian fleet had suffered two defeats at sea, at Abydos and then
Amorgos. This allowed Macedonian
reinforcements, under
Craterus to reach Greece. The Greek army abandoned the siege of Lamia, and
moved north to oppose them. At Crannon, the Macedonians won a major victory
over the Greek army. Alexander might have been dead, but his army was still
largely intact. In the aftermath of the battle, the Macedonians threatened to
besiege Athens. Faced with this threat, the Athenians surrendered. Their
democratic institutions were dramatically modified to increase the power of the
wealthier citizens, who had opposed the revolt, and a Macedonian garrison
placed in the Piraeus. The defeat at Crannon marked the end of ancient
Athenss last attempt to regain her own liberty. Later in the wars of the
Diadochi she would regain many of the internal freedoms lost in 322 BC, but
always as a gift from a foreign king.
|
|
|
Greek and Macedonian Land Battles of the 4th Century BC, Fred Eugene
Ray Jr. Looks at 187 battles fought during one of the most dramatic centuries
of Ancient History, a period that started with Sparta the dominant power of
Greece and ended with the successors of Alexander the Great squabbling over the
ruins of his Empire. An interesting study of a period in which Greek warfare
evolved dramatically, ending the dominance of the simple Hoplite army and
seeing the rise of cavalry as a battle winning weapon (Read Full Review)
|
|
|
Greek and Macedonian Land Battles of the 4th Century BC, Fred Eugene
Ray Jr This book covers one of the most dramatic centuries in ancient Greek
history. At the start Sparta was dominant, having just won the Great
Peloponnesian War. The Spartans didnt enjoy their supremacy for long, and
suffered a crushing defeat at Leuctra in 371 BC, only 33 years later. The
aftermath of this battle left Greece divided just as Philip of Macedonia turned
his kingdom in a major military power. Philips conquest of Greece was
followed by the brief but dramatic reign of Alexander the Great, which
transformed the Ancient World. Alexanders death was followed by the four
wars of the Diadochi (successors), which began as a struggle to
control all of Alexanders empire, and ended with most of the participants
attempted to hold onto their own little corners of the collapsing empire. Many
of the battles covered here are thus amongst the most famous in ancient
history, but one of the key strengths of this book is that Ray covers a total
of 187 battles, including many that are far less familiar, but often just as
interesting. This includes the battles of the Sicilian Greeks, by this time
dominated by the various dictators of Syracuse and their attempts to seize and
maintain power and ongoing struggle against Carthage for dominance of the
entire island. These Sicilian battles are interesting as one of the few
examples of clashes between Greeks and non-Greeks (outside the battles of
Philip and Alexander). One of the things that makes this book unusual is the
emphasis on the decisive factor in each of these battles. This
emerges in three ways - first on the level of the individual battle, looking at
how each one was won or lost, second looking at the way in which that changed
over time, as cavalry gained more importance and the type of infantry is use
changed and third looking at how particular types of troops could be used to
win a battle. The author presents a convincing theory about the relative
strengths of the Macedonian pikeman and standard Greek hoplite in battles
both were present in the armies of Philip, Alexander and the Successors
suggesting that the pikemen could hold the line very effectively, but
would be less effective as an attacking weapon. This is a useful study of this
period, providing an interesting overview of one of the most important periods
in ancient military history. Im not so convinced by the authors
estimates of the sizes of armies our sources simply dont agree
with each other, and often exaggerate wildly, so any attempt to produce
accurate figures almost always comes down to individual preferences, but in
this case those figures rarely matter the key to Rays approach is
the ratio between the troop types, their deployment and their role on the
battlefield, with the exact number of troops of secondary importance. Chapters
1 - Sparta Ascendant - Overseas Battles and the Corinthian War (400-387 BC) 2 -
Battles Around the Mediterranean; Chalcidian, Boeotian and Spartan Wars
(386-360 BC) 3 - Finding a Master; Rise of Macedonia; Sacred, Persian and
Sicilian Wars; Conquest of Greece (359-336 BC) 4 - Action and Glory: Battles in
the Era of Alexander the Great (335-324 BC) 5 - Many Great Combats: Battles of
the Successors (323-301 BC) Author: Fred Eugene Ray Jr Edition: Paperback
Pages: 244 Publisher: McFarland Year: 2012
|
|